Rankings Intelligence

Position Group Rankings

Mock rankings for position scarcity, volume, demand, and NIL activity.

Mock data only. Fictional names, placeholder sources, confidence labels, and timestamps are used to validate the product structure.

Every future claim should connect to a source, confidence score, timestamp, and review state. Predictions are projections, not facts.

Rank	Entity	Movement	Score	Confidence	Sources	Explanation
#1	Offensive Line 28 players · 5 elite · Critical scarcity · Mock	1	91	66% confidence	3	Mock offensive line market is scarce and demand-heavy.
#2	Quarterback 16 players · 3 elite · High scarcity · Mock	1	86	64% confidence	2	Mock quarterback demand remains high but volume improved.

Rank

Entity

Movement

Score

Confidence

Sources

Explanation

Offensive Line

28 players · 5 elite · Critical scarcity · Mock

66% confidence

Mock offensive line market is scarce and demand-heavy.

Quarterback

16 players · 3 elite · High scarcity · Mock

64% confidence

Mock quarterback demand remains high but volume improved.

Offensive Line

28 players · 5 elite · Critical scarcity

19166% confidence

Why this ranking exists

Mock offensive line market is scarce and demand-heavy.

Source confidence: 72Movement velocity: 81Roster impact: 76

Rank history

3 mock sourcesUpdated 2026-06-28T12:45:00.000Zpositions

Quarterback

16 players · 3 elite · High scarcity

18664% confidence

Why this ranking exists

Mock quarterback demand remains high but volume improved.

Source confidence: 72Movement velocity: 81Roster impact: 76

Rank history

2 mock sourcesUpdated 2026-06-28T12:45:00.000Zpositions

Methodology

Portal Pulse rankings are intelligence products, not popularity lists. They are designed to be source-aware, explainable, confidence-scored, and historically trackable. This phase uses fictional mock data only.

Every ranking explains why it exists.Movement compares current and previous rank.Confidence reflects mock source strength.History placeholders prepare trend charts.